The author begins this article with an interesting attention
getter; the crisis of wanting to please his son by letting him watch animal
shows, while at the same time not wanting to allow his son too much time on
T.V. This introduction helps the reader to give attention to the full article,
by being interesting, yet simple. The story contains one of the vacations that
the narrator and his family went on to try and see moose. In this article, the
author describes the first time his son, Henrik, had seen a moose. The author, his two sons, (Anders and
Henrik), and his wife Amy, were all very surprised the first time that they saw
a bull moose. The conclusion proves that the experience of seeing animals in
reality is so much more valuable than seeing them on T.V. This connects the introduction
and conclusion, wrapping up the essay with strong, descriptive writing.
Axelson uses descriptive language and real facts throughout
his narrative article. These forms of writing make the article much more
interesting and make the reader feel as if he is experiencing what the Axelson
family felt. Instead of merely saying antlers, the author wrote “two branches of velvet extending from either side of its
head” to describe the bull moose that he saw. This writing enriches the
article, and causes the reader to enjoy reading it. Also, throughout the entire
essay the author does a good job of describing the entire family vacation
without elaborating too much on the details. Overall, the essay was very
well-written, and had strong language usage throughout.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/28/travel/looking-for-moose-to-moon-over.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&version=Moth-Visible&module=inside-nyt-region®ion=inside-nyt-region&WT.nav=inside-nyt-region&_r=1
No comments:
Post a Comment