Thompson
opens his article by saying that social mobility in America is actually “social
immobility.” He says how even if students have a great shot at moving up their
income, most fail to do so. Around 8% of kids born in the 1980’s to the country’s
least-earning families actually managed to make it to reach the top level of
earnings today. Most people’s location on the economic ladder depends on where
they’re born. This means a child’s future is greatly determined by their
parents’ economic status. The income of parents is the first thing that
influences a child. Rich parents’ kids are 80% more likely to go to college
than those of poor parents. Also, teenage girls from poor families are 37% more
likely to get pregnant than those from rich families. The second thing that
determines a child’s future is their parents’ marriage (or living arrangement).
Children of married parents have a greater probability of getting ahead than
children of single parents. Thompson, however, also states that rich single
parents’ kids tend to be richer than poor married couple’s kids. This does mean
that low-income parents have even lower-income kids, who are more likely to
become single parents and raise their children in that same way. The third determinant is that parents decide
where their child lives, and opportunities vary greatly from place to place. He
then explains how it is easier for people to raise their income in cities such
as Salt Lake City or San Francisco rather than Atlanta or Charlotte. He ends with
David Wessel’s summary of the report: "Though
mobility hasn’t worsened, inequality has. Winning the birth lottery matters
more than ever."
Derek Thompson, a senior editor
at The Atlantic wrote about the
economy and how parents are important for a child’s economic future. The
article was informational and he explained 3 ways about how parents determine
their child’s future economically. He uses data information to add credibility
to his article. He also included a map of the United States showing the areas in
which it is easier or harder to grow in the economic ladder. His diction is
informal to make it easy for all readers to understand the information presented.
He ended in a very strong way using a summary of the report by David Wessel (American
writer and journalist). This causes the reader to remember everything he just
read and make his own conclusions about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment